Not everyone who claims to be a victim will automatically be paid under the Redress Scheme.
An Independent Decision Maker will consider your application. They are highly experienced people from a range of backgrounds
The Independent Decision Maker is the person that decides if a person can access redress under the Scheme, and if so, what redress the institution(s) needs to make. To do this, the Independent Decision Maker considers all the information provided in your application and by the institution(s). If they determine that the events are likely to have happened, then an offer of redress will be made.
https://www.nationalredress.gov.au/applying/what-happens-next#step2
Now I guess Watchtower doesn't want any filthy wordly person decide om their behalf they should apologize and or cough up money.
The redress scheme looks fair enough. After all, each application if reviewed individually.
It could very well be that the Decision Maker decides in most cases that JW don't need to pay as the abuse didn't happen in their church building or while the victim was in their custody (as per JWs claims).
But the core issue is that Watchtower wants to control everything themselves. They don't tolerate interference from outsiders. That becomes clear everytime one government or another wants to poke their nose into Watchtower business, whether it's CSA related or not.